linux

Windows VS. Linux Security Report

Filed in archive Linux For Windows Users on August 28, 2006

pic

Perhaps the most oft-repeated myth regarding Windows vs. Linux security is the claim that Windows has more incidents of viruses, worms, Trojans and other problems because malicious hackers tend to confine their activities to breaking into the software with the largest installed base. This reasoning is applied to defend Windows and Windows applications. Windows dominates the desktop; therefore Windows and Windows applications are the focus of the most attacks, which is why you don't see viruses, worms and Trojans for Linux. While this may be true, at least in part, the intentional implication is not necessarily true: That Linux and linux applications are no more secure than Windows and Windows applications, but Linux is simply too trifling a target to bother attacking.
Much ado has been made about whether or not Linux is truly more secure than Windows. We compared Windows vs. Linux by examining the following metrics in the 40 most recent patches/vulnerabilities listed for Microsoft Windows Server 2003 vs. Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS v.3.

Read the report at TheRegister

Permalink: Windows VS. Linux Security Report

Tags: linux  vs  window  2000  linux  vs  window  linux  vs  web  window  linux  tips  ilnux  llinux  kinux  security  secu 

Vote for Windows VS. Linux Security Report:

  • Currently 8.50/10
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
Rating: 8.50 out of 8 vote(s) cast.
 
Share It
RSSrss
Google google
Yahoo! yahoo
Addthis Subscribe using any feed reader!
Bloglines Bloglines
TwitterFollow us on Twitter!
Most Popular   Applications   Applicatios   Best of   Devices   Did you know   Education   Entertainment   Finding The Right Linux For You   FreeBSD   Hacks   Humor   Information About   Linux For Windows Users   Multimedia   Networking   News   OS   Programming   Securing   Servers